People have different views about whether every country should have its own film industry and produce movies locally or importing those from outside region. There are controversial arguments from both sides and I believe importing from foreign countries and worldwide TV channels is more feasible.
On the one hand, broadcasting TV programmes and other films from various cultures seems like a better choice. First of all, TV viewers who are receptive to new experiences are having a chance to see more deeply into the outside world as each film is created according to the directors, producers, and actors in that particular country. For example, US TV series such as Friends and The Big bang theory is a great choice at the weekend for viewers in Asia region in order to practice English. Secondly, since foreign TV programmes are finished products which are lesser in cost and ready to order so users do not have to stay in line for a long period to see their favorite programmes. Finally, the intellectual content in self-made movies requires hours of creativity and selective quality control before broadcasting to general viewers and it is not sure about whether the audience accepts it or not.
On the other hand, homemade movies might be in favor for various reasons. This type of film promotes its own morality and cultural ethics since they are inferred directly from what actually underlying in that country. For example, the truth of a famous event is being described closest to the truth by the local film directors. Also, self-made films can be used as a means to advertise and promote the culture to other parts of the world. Not to mention younger generation when watching these programmes shows are more understandable of what their country has gone through in history and show more empathy with the ancestry.
In conclusion, there are both negative and positive impacts on a country's culture by foreign TV programmes and local product but it seems to me that importing movies and film from other area is a better solution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97667638484 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61796541483 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568513119534 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.9785131191 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.307692308 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2254425334 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811369357391 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591689081752 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156779193308 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522135058796 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.