Some people think that it is a good thing for senior management positions to have very high salaries compared to other workers of the same company or organization. To what extend do you agree?
Over the recent years, it has become normal for high-level managers to receive astronomical salaries in comparison to ordinary labors. In my view, not only is not this trend positive, it can also lead to a range of negative consequences for both individuals and companies.
Allocating a considerable proportion of company's profit to manager's pay can affect the company negatively. Human resources are said to be the principal pillars of any firm because actually, those are who work hard. Therefore, employee's satisfaction should be vitally important for senior managers. If workers, particularly those who are enough competent in terms of academic and practical qualifications, realized that despite making effort, the main part of company's revenue is spent on paying manager's salary, they will perhaps lose their motivation. Consequently, these workforces either leave their job or work inefficiently, resulting in lack of profitability in long term.
At the same time, a huge gap between manager's income level and their employees can be detrimental for them. Having lived in luxury, senior leaders are more likely to not understand their worker's level of life. As a consequence, they usually do not pay enough attention to improve workplace conditions, for example providing promotion prospect for employees. This trend gradually leads to a bigger gap between high- level and ordinary workers, and eventually elimination of collaborative work atmosphere. In this way, top managers may lose their popularity and power which are significantly important for them to keep their position.
In conclusion, I do not agree with an unreasonable difference between employer and employee's income level as this can be disadvantageous.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5320754717 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17314739093 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641509433962 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9819485896 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.769230769 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15952618213 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573694783174 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364998155435 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910128343028 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286145585422 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.