Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Nowadays, the benefits of group studying and self-taught are still controversial to many people. Both ways of learning have their advantages to my perspective.
On one hand, It could be argued that self-education has diversified advantages. Firstly, Studying alone helps people to get high concentration to memorize the information and improve their note-taking skills. Therefore, Students could find their style of studying and could not be affected by other level of knowledge, thinking way and doing. For instance, when students study in class, they would be easily affected by their style of thinking and doing from their teacher, without figure out their own problems. It is considered to be the way of passive learning. Secondly, Studying alone is an opportunity for students to do all the tasks on their own in the way they want and take responsibility for everything they have done, therefore these develop the curiosity and creative skills.
On the other hand, there are a great number of advantages when students decide to take part in group studying. Firstly, Each individual comes up with their ideas to discuss and create an overview of projects .From that students could detect the errors and fix them to handle the problems. Secondly, Studying in a group would improve people’s listening skills because being in collaboration means people have the duty to unify their opinions to contribute to the overall work of the group. It is inevitable to have dissent between members in a group, and listening to other team members is the essential thing.
In conclusion, I do hold the belief that both kinds of learning are effective for students but It is necessary to choose the appropriate way of studying to achieve the highest efficiency in acquiring knowledge
- The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003/04 and 2013/14 78
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- the table below shows the primary funding sources of international studentes in the US during the years 2003/04 and 2013/14. 67
- The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003/04 and 2013/14 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
...l to many people. Both ways of learning have their advantages to my perspective. ...
Line 3, column 790, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...elop the curiosity and creative skills. On the other hand, there are a great num...
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
...scuss and create an overview of projects .From that students could detect the erro...
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
...uss and create an overview of projects .From that students could detect the errors a...
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ighest efficiency in acquiring knowledge
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, still, therefore, as to, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17993079585 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89042307689 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539792387543 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6620602283 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.153846154 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275005753643 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910599798577 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566294364507 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161664182672 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361048981271 0.056905535591 63% => OK
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.