Some people have different perspectives about whether group work or individual work is better for students. Some people believe that working with other friends is the best way for students to gain optimal effects. Nevertheless, others argue that studying by themselves brings better benefits. I am in favor of the former. This essay sheds light into both view points and supports my perception.
On the one hand, studying alone may benefit individuals' learning in some ways. Firstly, students will become more independent if they have to solve their problems alone. In other words, they need to think and find out the answers to certain exercises on their own as soon as they face a problem. Consequently, learners may feel more confident and flexible to deal with a similar issue if they encounter it someday. Secondly, some particular subjects need to be quiet and concentration, so individual study is the top choice for students. Take literature as an example, the more people work together in this field, the worse the work will become.
On the other hand, studying in group is considered as the better approach which produces more effective learning outcomes. First and foremost, the results generated from group work is often the best. Indeed, when school individuals work in group to discuss and plan for a project, they will exchange their ideas. As a result, the optimal solution will be chosen from the integration of such ideas. In addition, students are able to be equipped with some necessary skills such as interpersonal and team-working skills for the modern working world. In particular, through discussions in groups, students may be more sociable and feel easier to share their ideas with their team members. Moreover, team spirit acquired from group study may facilitate members positively in the future. Last but not least, working with others provides opportunities for students to learn much more knowledge or consult from others, then improve themselves. For instance, if a student does not have any skills about computers like Power point and Word, he is able to complement these skills thanks to his friends' instructions and supports throughout the period of working together.
In conclusion, in spite of the fact that private study can also be advantageous to learners, it seems to me that in most cases studying with peers can makes a more profound contribution to effective learning.
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.61
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries india and China. Write a report to university lecture and describe the data.73
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both view and give your opinion88
- Write about the following topic:Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your o84
- Development in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opini89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 549, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g skills, for the modern working world. In particular, through discussions in grou...
Line 5, column 1183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...oughout the period of working together. In conclusion, in spite the fact that pr...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as, in most cases, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20103092784 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74461665956 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559278350515 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.2671376146 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7272727273 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3681346987 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987135288854 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682180510023 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224009903739 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612964922248 0.056905535591 108% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.