Development in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
It is true that technological growth has done harms to environment. Some people claim that mankinds are responsible for addressing these environmental issues. Nevertheless, others argued that it is technological advances that make profound contributions to improve the quality of environment. I think there should be a combination of mentioned approaches. This essay will shed light on both view points and support my perception.
On the one hand, humans need to survive as well as make efforts to tackle environmental problems. Firstly, the overuse of technological devices should be reduced. For example, the high level of greenhouse gas emissions which mostly stem from the significant increase in the use of high-tech equipments such as air-conditioners, TV or private cars could be controlled if users limit their reliance on such inventions. Secondly, raising people’s awareness of environmental dangers may be the crucial action. People, especially young generations, should be informed about the issues facing their future, and the responsibilities they need to assume. Therefore, the environmental problems should be added in the curriculum in schools, or there should be more green compaigns.
On the other hand, environmental dangerous problems may be handled by technological development itselt. One of the most typical is the discovery of alternative sources of energy such as solar energy, wind and water power. Instead of using fossil fuels (coal and oils), people can use solar energy to operate modern machines without environmental pollution. For instance, the advent of electric cars may be the optimal alternative of current cars. Another method of taking advantage of technology to help alleviate environmental problems is to implement more precious scientific research making the earth become a environmentally purified planet. A case in pont is waste treatment system which is beneficial for limiting the number of chemical wastes released into rivers and seas by manufaturing factories or households.
In conclusion, it is undenied that many environmental issues are caused by the technological development. Although there are different perspectives about whether technology or mankind will take the main duty to tackle these problems, it seems to me that applying both aspects would be the best solution.
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world.61
- Older people often say that their life was better in the past than it is now Do you agree or disagree with this statement84
- Development in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opini89
- The chart gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 200273
- Write about the following topic:Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your o84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
... view points and support my perception. On the one hand, humans need to survive ...
Line 5, column 610, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
...ntific research making the earth become a environmentally purified planet. A cas...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2209.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64961636829 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27050679604 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590792838875 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0805755117 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.409090909 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7727272727 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77272727273 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421499005545 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144094045121 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179642358289 0.0667982634062 269% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30739763544 0.151304729494 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.325765796531 0.056905535591 572% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.