Urban tree planning has been a controversial matter in the light of the growing population and the increasing global awareness of environmental issues. Some people hold that growing population makes more demand for housing space in open areas rather than for the planting areas. From my point of view, I partly agree with this idea.
On the one hand, the architecture makes the basic environment and living condition for people. It is undeniable that houses have to be constructed due to the prediction of the population. This is certainly true, however, open space in urban areas can be available for architectures and green space at the same time. Many landscape architecture designs, such as the New York Central Park, create a smooth connection between the architecture complex and nature. By doing so, these open spaces ready for development in urban areas can be envisioned, which trees will be planted around the buildings and people can enjoy the pleasure brought by the green spaces once they leave the houses.
On the other hand, it is certainly true that trees bring considerable benefits for promoting the urban environment, but it is unreasonable if planting areas occupy most of the open spaces. One of the major concerns is the conflict between the space for planting and the space for constructing buildings. Beside that, the huge number of trees will create a large number of habitats for unexpected insects and mammals. Part of them might be invasive species and cause quantities of problems let alone solving the island effect or other global issues. In addition to that, such a high-density group of trees probably cannot survive for a long time in the existing environment because the hard and compacted urban surface might not perfectly match the environmental condition for growing trees.
In conclusion, open space should not be used for trees more than for buildings and vice versa, because both the urban construction and tree planting should be executed according to a detailed urban planning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...t, the huge number of trees will create a large number of habitats for unexpected insects and mam...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13897280967 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76299803478 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546827794562 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.17122516 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153158955929 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549693342871 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691809022476 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118617200254 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556556131055 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.