It is certainly true that an increasing number of tourists are choosing to visit remote natural landscape. This is probably due to a combination of transportation development and the growing curiosity and enthusiasm of people to experiencing some new parts of the world. I personally have a positive vision on this trend of tourists on several extents.
Perhaps one major advantage of remote tourism is that nowadays people stand a chance of exploring the most marvelous landscape existing in the earth by themselves. Once upon a time, for example, the south pole was a mystery land full of dangers and the unknown. Only few people with the latest equipment and the strongest physical condition, which most of them were so-called scientists, were willing to make any sacrifice for this capricious journey of exploration. However, this frightening saying is no longer exist since the colossal ship solves the hardship of transportation, and people have a number of technologies overcoming the severe conditions.
There are, of course, negative aspects of remote tourism. The greatest of these is that it still remains some possible problems, and part of them may be life-threatening, such as dangerous animals and unpredicted weather conditions. Having known this, some people even feel more encouraged to go for the remote environment, because this is part of the excitement and interest of exploration to them. In my experience, the stress and fear of the unknown will probably turn into a greater sense of achievement during a challenging exploration.
My conclusion is that although there are some disadvantages in the light of unexpected challenges, the remote journey still brings people the greatest pleasure and unique experience beyond compare.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, thus, for example, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36823104693 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10585991005 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617328519856 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3066469911 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.916666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214351837358 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694634430684 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391202093881 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114020047236 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357938301311 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.