It is certainly true that traffic accident becomes one of the greatest issues of road safety. Many youngsters who are just over the minimum legal age for driving and riding are eager to get the license, and this seems to cause more traffic menaces. I do agree the adjustment of minimum driving age is one effective measure to solve this problem, but it is not the only best way.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that nowadays the majority of drivers consists of young people, and they have to be responsible for their behaviors. Drunk drivers, for example, who are mainly the youngsters coming from a binge party threaten the traffic safety the whole time. Thus, appropriate adjustment of driving age can function as one strategy on account of the situation. However, it is not difficult to find drunk drivers in the group of middle-aged people, namely the parents of youngsters. In other words, solutions to this specific situation should also consider older people
On the other hand, the traffic accident is not only related to drivers, let alone young drivers. Indeed, it is usually associated with several aspects. First, drivers and pedestrians are definitely involved with this issue. For example, the smartphone addicts will be easily targeted by a vehicle driven by someone drunk. Second, terrible road condition is usually found to be the context of a traffic accident. A sudden failure of signal lamp and the congestion in peak period can easily bring an accident. Besides, the road condition is also interrelated with road safety. A narrow driveway, compared with a broad driveway, for example, usually brings more possibility of the traffic accident.
In conclusion, the strategy of adjusting driving age is effective to some extent, but it is not the best solution. A combination of improvement in road planning or urban planning and driver-pedestrian management policy should be taken into overall consideration.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, second, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14240506329 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80706548694 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537974683544 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6384192939 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5882352941 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202930407703 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060701617557 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662954627899 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131490884754 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672768745435 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.