It is certainly true that museums and historical sites seem to be more appealing to tourists than to local people. This is probably due to a combination of the expanding strategy of tourism and the growing curiosity of people living outside this site. In this essay, I am going to discuss this topic on account of several extents and give some suggestions regarding it.
.
On the one hand, tourists who are willing to read a city and know the locals usually go to visit the museum or other historical sites. This brings visitors the information of the history, culture, and context of the place. However, someone who has been a resident in a place for a long time must be quite familiar with the things which the museum displays. Having known this, it is understandable that the locals may not easily get interested in a local history trip.
On the other hand, the displays in a museum or the historical architectures and landscapes don`t update in the light of modernization. Although they are attractive to tourists, the locals, having seen the historical display in a museum, for example, hardly come back to see the same things again and again. In other words, local people may not remember every item of the displays but live within the context represented by those things.
In my experience, there certainly are some methods to attract more local people to go to the museum. Firstly, the commercial strategy is a significant method which can merge new and fresh interest with the historical memory. Examples of the local pass ticket and discounting of connected products can encourage more local people to come back to look around. Additionally, people can create videos, music, and media by cinematography and broadcasting. Innovative media can always work as an innovative method for rekindling local people with the memory of history.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...and give some suggestions regarding it. . On the one hand, tourists who are will...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, for example, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99677419355 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79682515595 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.4008714411 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.266666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381698581785 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12021538125 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753878075634 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212473546074 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059040316822 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.