It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as South Pole.
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that with recent advances in technology, it can be easy for the human to conquer vacant lands such as the south pole. While this trend can be beneficial to some extents, I believe that it has more drawbacks.
On the one hand, there is a common belief that discovering remote areas can create positive influences on the human because of two major reasons. Firstly, travelling to remote natural environment plays an important role in collecting reliable data for science. For example, this data can help scientists properly explain some complex phenomenon such as El Nino, global warming or desertification. Secondly, because undiscovered habitats tend to hold great mysteries, it can receive special attention of a great number of tourists. As a result, this acts as a precursor so that the government can develop the tourism
On the other hand, I would strongly endorse that those benefits are outweighed by drawbacks. The first supporting point for this view is that since visitors are likely to produce a large amount of untreated waste that can pollute water sources and harm the fauna and flora around isolated areas. This leads to the damage to the environment. Moreover, tourists and sciences can face serious danger when they conquer isolated areas. A clear illustration is that they can encounter dangerous wild animals or even they are in a situation without food in some days.
In conclusion, while going to undiscovered areas can make beneficial impacts on the human, I believe that this tendency can be much more advantageous.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07421875 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79964237654 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61328125 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.914491938 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1811004033 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685810580739 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536081546454 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098127690575 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482389399212 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.