Visiting in isolated area is always a matter of interest of human being. Though it have some drawbacks, i think the benefits are far more.
On the one hand, there are several advantages related with traveling the remote areas. Firstly, there are numerous animals and plants yet to discover which might reach benefits of people. We can find more and more new species by researching jungle, and if find something beneficial, we can take the advantage of it. For instance, in 2002, a team of scientists went into the Amazon rain forest and there they found some tree that can destroy the Virus of Malaria, a dangerous disease, and by the help of this the earth was relived from the death equal disease. As a result of this, we can be helped by some species. Furthermore, we will also be able to know about our earth more, and can figure out what other thing can bring more improvement in the globe. We can create a new life style and new way of living in the field of medical. Consequently, we will be able to live our live more longer and safer.
On the other hand, the shortcomings should also be taken into account. One of this is that visitors can be attacked by some dangerous animal and may cause death. In the forest, there lived numerous deadly animals which are unknown to the human can attack them. Consequently, the scientists have to lost their lives in some cases. Moreover, it is too costly and there is a great chances of being waste of money. One group from London, for example, went to the South pole where they have to spent 23 billions of dollars. However, even though investing a huge amount of money the group unable to discover anything that can reach advantage of people. Therefore, the whole money went to vain and there was nothing in return except some experience.
In conclusion, people visit isolated area can bear loads of benefits for the human being, however, the chance of losing lives and money are also a matter of concern.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...r of interest of human being. Though it have some drawbacks, i think the benefits ar...
^^^^
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...n being. Though it have some drawbacks, i think the benefits are far more. On ...
^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e. We can find more and more new species by researching jungle, and if find somet...
^^
Line 3, column 629, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be helped by some species. Furthermore, we will also be able to know about our e...
^^
Line 3, column 884, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'longer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: longer
...ently, we will be able to live our live more longer and safer. On the other hand, the s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or example, went to the South pole where they have to spent 23 billions of dollar...
^^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '23 billion'.
Suggestion: 23 billion
...he South pole where they have to spent 23 billions of dollars. However, even though investing...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61142857143 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38052643809 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528571428571 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.605763425 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9473684211 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.89473684211 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0806670003099 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0268800112801 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375014058631 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0411425345978 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029122198052 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.