Currently, there is debate about whether planting more trees in open areas is more beneficial than giving excess to increasing the number of shelters in urban areas. As far as I am concerned, I believe that facilitating people with more houses is equally important.
Compelling arguments can be made that developing open lands into housing infrastructure is as important as planting trees. The first point with respect to this is that the rapid growth of the population in cities demands more houses. There is no denying that in the coming future the population in rural areas, going to migrate towards urban areas for a better future and lifestyle. Furthermore, building more houses is going to be beneficial for the poor and homeless people of the cities, who don't have the basic human needs that is shelter. More importantly, creating open fields into a place where people can stay with their families and contribute to the growth of the particular city. Clearly, if cities grow in a particular country, it attracts a significant amount of people from the surrounding locations.
It may be tempting to argue that people should only plant trees in the vacant areas of cities. Nowadays, urban planning engineers are using a technique called "Vertical Forest" which allows them to plant trees vertically on each floor of the multi-storied buildings. By that I mean, the most dangerous cause of not planting trees to overcome the pollution made by humans can also be controlled by humans in a variety of different modern ways. Further analysis made it clear that a single vertical forest can reduce pollution by much more numbers than expected.
On the basis of the above discussion, I believe that the development of the infrastructure in cities is as important as planting trees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... and homeless people of the cities, who dont have the basic human needs that is shel...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, as for, i mean, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08108108108 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85902643224 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547297297297 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3709992078 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.692307692 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328960265104 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113510930895 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678937047687 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202151262428 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.091319819387 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.