Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a common belief that each person has gender-specific personalities and competence, thereby men and women should pursuit a career based on their sexes. While I think the belief, although sounds like a social prejudice, can be applied to most cases, I completely disagree with the deduction from it.
On the one hand, it is a well-established fact that both genders have its own unique characters and abilities to a certain extent. From a social point view, mankind has had these distinguished features grouped as masculine and feminine traits throughout the history that makes people automatically assume every male and female to have a handful of characters in the corresponding group. For instance, men are usually seen as physically stronger than women, along with better analytical abilities, while women show distinct diligence, meticulousness and both higher physical and mental endurance, all of which has been proven by various valid scientific studies. From a historical perspective, the distinct difference of physical strength between the two genders, among many other causes, leads to the transition of human society from to matriarchy to patriarchy, where, until the near of modern days, the man holds the role of breadwinner and his wife accepts to be a housewife, taking care of the family. All the aforementioned facts serve as a clear evidence that men and women have some distinguishable qualities.
On the other hand, I would argue that there isn't any kind of profession that only men can do but not women because of several reason. First of all, nowadays, most positions in fields like politic, science, business, etc., or jobs that require significant vitality, are continue to be dominant by men, whilst the opposite sex is major in educational or health-related occupations. The root of this problem is not due to the different qualities between the genders, it is the outdated stereotypes of society that women should not have access to higher education, better to stay at home and do household duties. As a consequence, many girls have been barred from going to university or acquiring higher degrees, who could have significantly contributed to national pool of talent. Another reason should be considered is that there are virtually no male-specific jobs, except corrections officers in prison for male prisoners or religious official, and vice versa. Therefore, thanks to this overlooked fact, it's absolutely feasible for both men and women to hold same position in companies, state agencies, etc.
In conclusion, while I support the view that the two genders are utterly disparate in term of characters and abilities, I wholeheartedly disagree that some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...he other hand, I would argue that there isnt any kind of profession that only men ca...
^^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
...nly men can do but not women because of several reason. First of all, nowadays, most positions...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'continued'.
Suggestion: continued
... that require significant vitality, are continue to be dominant by men, whilst the oppos...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2326.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 443.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25056433409 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03734314461 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589164785553 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.8409750144 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.142857143 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6428571429 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358020313516 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111918705309 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123577198759 0.0667982634062 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234757385367 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158283339898 0.056905535591 278% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.