Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable,while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays technology has made rapid progress in the past decades and it changed the way of people to communicate with each other’s. However, a section of society deems that due to these humans are more friendly because they make new friends any part from the world, connect with anyone who far from them, express feelings to uploading status. Whilst others neglect this the reason is that lack of face to face interactions, absence of touch feelings, never spending times with families as well.
The one school of thought claims that technology allows people to more sociable with everyone conveniently because it provide a vast amount of social networking applications such as Facebook, Instagram, What’s aap and etcetera. In addition to this, these apps are not only assist masses to develop new friends but also help them to express their views with uploading the status. Moving further, a drastic incline is observing in the masses to expanding those applications to keep in touch with their relatives who living in the foreign regions. For example, a huge number of international students are escalating day by day to commute in various nations for studies so that is why their families utilise these apps to keep in touch with them. Due to help of these applications humans can eligible to share their photos, videos, documents easily with anyone.
The another school of thought against the first perception the fact is that with using modern gadgets dependent on technologies lead to creating depth among humans relationships. Additionally, they are staying at rooms, laying on beds and operating these gadgets for couple of times. As a result, which lead to lots of perilous ailments and complications such as obesity, loneliness as well as they become coach-potatoes. In contrast, the face to face interactions are decreasing dramatically due to presence of technologies who offer feelings of isolation among people. According to this, today lack of human touch is found by people from their partners which broke their relationships. For instance, in today’s era people sharing their feelings with sending messages who never fulfilled the place of face to face complications and touch’s. All in all, these all factors are responsible to make less sociable to people with the help of technology.
In my prospective, due to gradual advancement in technology who offer masses to make friends from any part of the globe but it’s means is not to expanding a large proportion of periods to operate these applications. In contemporary words, over use of technologies take people far away from their relatives and families. Moreover, utilising a great percentage of periods with families and friends are an essential for them for strong relationships.
In conclusion, although, technology give aid to people for more social but it is the factor to create so many hurdles between humans and masses feel isolate due to entrance of technologies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...e with everyone conveniently because it provide a vast amount of social networking appl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 91.0 41.998997996 217% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2510.0 1615.20841683 155% => OK
No of words: 478.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2510460251 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94749012628 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510460251046 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 767.7 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2683078321 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.105263158 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1578947368 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73684210526 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138100843907 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466277298105 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379203018006 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921655459689 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200019865457 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.