Some people think that new houses should be built in the same style as other houses in the area. Others think that the local councils should allow people to build houses in any style they want
It is a controversial issue as to whether newly-built houses should be built in the same style as existing homes in the same area; or whether the residents should have permission to construct their houses in their own style. My view is that people should be given the permission to build their houses in their own design, as long as these designs satisfy the safety requirements.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why all buildings in a particular area should have the same style. Firstly, when houses look similar it will enhance a sense of community and equality in a residential area. This is because a house often reflects the wealth and social status of its owner. If a house looks older, smaller, and less attractive than others, the people living there may feel inferior and less confident when socialising with their neighbours. In contrast, a house which stands out in the neighbourhood would make its owner the target of gossip and burglary. Secondly, when houses share a common design, it will be easier for the local government to supervise the process of constructing, and to make sure that these buildings are safe for both the inhabitants and the neighbours.
On the other hand, it should be the people’s right to build their own house in their own style. A good building should satisfy all three principles of durability, utility, and beauty. It should not only be strong in design and be built to last a long time, but also inspire the people that live there by its aesthetic design. If each house in an area is built in a unique style, it will greatly contribute to the diverse image of the town and lift the spirit of the locals. Only when a person is satisfied and comfortable in their own house, can they feel the same outside.
In conclusion, even though there are certain justifications for houses in an area to be constructed in the same style, I am of the opinion that the state should give people the permission to build their houses according to their own ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
It is a controversial issue as to whether newly-built houses should be built in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a unique style" with adverb for "unique"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...sign. If each house in an area is built in a unique style, it will greatly contribute to the dive...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, as to, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72443181818 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63861427982 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488636363636 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3074466489 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.785714286 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431855275893 0.244688304435 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157944321185 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937548818519 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302742610592 0.151304729494 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033112453807 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.