Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease, governments should try to reduce environmental pollution and housing problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Environmental problem has been considered to be a pressing issue in number of discussions relating to future existence of human beings. Some people believe that illness and disease is attributed solely to environment and housing conditions and governments should work to address these problems urgently. I strongly support the belief.
The solid waste in cities degenerate surroundings supporting growth and spread of disease-causing microbes. Firstly, it pollutes sources of water when rainwater that falls upon the piles of decayed waste is then carried into nearby sources of water. Consequently, the microbes reach people’s gut and cause diseases when they consume water from such contaminated sources. Secondly, the foul smell that comes out from waste carries air-borne diseases and spread in no time. It may also give rise to epidemics if not treated promptly. For instance, the monsoon in southeast Asia not only brings in flood and landslide but also is responsible for the spread of most of the water borne diseases. Until governments of the region work on mitigation and adaptation, health and poverty situations are supposed to degrade further.
Housing conditions are also responsible for deteriorating public health specially in the underdeveloped countries. The temporary structures with inadequate air circulation space cause the spread of diseases among the household members via polluted air. In addition, poor sanitation management in the household also give rise to deadly diseases. For example, lack of safe toilets and clean kitchen is one of the major cause of diseases in refugee camps and temporary settlements. If the government take the issue seriously and spend money for prevention of poverty related disease spread, the situation is sure to improve.
To sum up, most illness and diseases are the result of faulty environmental and housing conditions of a locality and governments must prioritise in coping with these issues with utmost urgency. In order to have a sustainable solution, the rules and regulations must be formed and implemented strictly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51863354037 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00532717612 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596273291925 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6406244501 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.529411765 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121085028348 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349545609674 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490877127945 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878741286047 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474392494224 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.