There is a debate whether it is parents' or school's responsibility in educating children to be good society members. I completely agree with both views because of several reasons.
On the one hand, children's habits are usually learned from the family. If someone has used to behave correctly in the family, he will most likely to act properly in other communities, including in the society. Thus, as children's guides and role models, parents bear the responsibility to make sure their children have good behaviors wherever they are. For instance, Anthony has been taught to say thank you every time he received toys from his parents. As a result, Antony has been used to say thank you whenever he received a favor from someone else, including in the public places and communities outside his house.
On the other hand, school also holds important role in internalizing values to children. This is because, most of children's time are spent in the school. Thus, school is responsible in teaching values that will support positive values which have been taught in children's families, including how to be good members of society. The more children being taught of positive values, the more likely for them to apply those positive values in their life. For example, Anthony is taught about how to say thank you after receiving a favor through Civilization lecture. After being taught in his family and his school, Anthony almost never forgets to say thank you after receiving something from people. The lecture that he learns in school supports the lecture that he has learned from their parents.
In conclusion, I completely agree that both parents and school bear the same responsibility in teaching children to be good society members because children's habits are usually learned from the family, where parents as role models should ensure their children behave correctly wherever they are. Moreover, because most of children's time are spent in school, school also bear the responsibility in internalizing positive values that support parents' teachings.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21021021021 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64205562686 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441441441441 0.561755894193 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8497948948 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4375 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244930925494 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091897509851 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715192456674 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179962115304 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644889412957 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.