Some folks consider that parents ought to teach children on how to become acceptable members of community. Others think that school is the appropriate place to grasp this. But in my view, both schools and parents need to lay equal emphasis. This essay will support my opinion with relevant examples.
When it comes to schools, teachers have to embolden children to play in groups rather than playing alone. Since this type of practise opens up copious opportunities for conflict and negotiation, which aid them to learn to consider the needs and feelings of peers. So the development of interpersonal understandings forms a solid basis for learning social skills in the course of time. Not only would this strategy generate strong motivations for developing social skills but also it could subject children to remain intensely competitive. Secondly, teaching children to appreciate variations and differences between cultures is one of the leading roles of teachers, which is actually decisive for children's social development. For illustration, if children from minority cultures suffer from gender discrimination, there is a high possibility that it will undermine a sense of connectedness and belonging, impeding ultimately the public progression.
At the same time, parents need to become a true role model for their children by displaying exemplary behavior. For many, as children are almost always with their parents, they are found to have an innate longing to copy and learn about the routine activities of the parents. For instance, children who are grown up experiencing a heated argument between parents tend to adopt hostile attitudes and vice versa, risking themselves to an outright rejection by the community members. In addition, children were found to more conscientious and prosocial when the parents exercised inductive discipline. Next, being calm and supportive while children are upset remains an immense tool, which can eventually lead children to grow into good associates of society. Because children who receive emotional support are less likely to direct negative emotions at peers, and they are better loved by peers and rated as socially competent by mentors instead.
In conclusion, considering the discussed measures, schools and parents are uniformly liable for nurturing children to develop into useful members of community.
Essay evaluation report
Since this type of practise opens up copious opportunities for conflict and negotiation, which aid them to learn to consider the needs and feelings of peers
Description: 'them' refers to what? Be sensitive to use pronouns.
by displaying exemplary behavior.
by displaying exemplary behaviors.
Sentence: In addition, children were found to more conscientious and prosocial when the parents exercised inductive discipline.
Error: prosocial Suggestion: No alternate word
--------------------
flaws:
We may not repeat this sentence structure for 'which':
opportunities for conflict and negotiation, which aid them to learn
is one of the leading roles of teachers, which is actually decisive
are upset remains an immense tool, which can eventually lead
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 364 350
No. of Characters: 1956 1500
No. of Different Words: 225 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.368 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.374 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.817 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 154 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 128 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 93 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.412 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.757 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.529 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.314 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.505 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.065 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...velop into useful members of community.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50274725275 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9035160489 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631868131868 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6545382655 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.823529412 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230077249483 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775975842976 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568331906759 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160535787875 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860479706569 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.