Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
When discussing about career path, many people believe that it is better to work consistently in an organisation, in stead of changing the job usually. Personally, I disagree with this statement. I think that the both decisions can be beneficial, depending on what the employee is aiming for. This essay will explain the reasons.
At first glance, it is apparent that maintaining a certain job in a long time has advantages to both employees and employers. Firstly, it increases the probability of promotion. When working continuously with an individual, the employer would evaluate talent and potential of the person, therefore would offer him managerial posts. It can be seen nowadays that the majority of directors working in large-scaled enterprises are experienced people. Besides, working in a company for years will ensure that the employees get used to collaborating with colleagues and the office environment, hence higher job satisfaction.
On the other hand, however, there are several reasons that underlie decision of switching jobs. The change might happen due to disappointment within working environment. For example, young employees usually feel unsuitable with a hierarchical company, so they quit and start searching for a more flat structure. Sometimes, job hoppers lose their passion of working in a certain profession, thus starting a novel paths. Indeed, this phenomenon is actually common in the young community, in which people would rather pursue interest than have a well-paid job.
In conclusion, although lengthy duration is an essential factor for career progression, it is absolutely possible to change jobs frequently until one finds the ideal occupation, because passion and satisfaction also play important roles. As a result, I believe that there are different ways to achieve satisfaction in workplace, including constant working and frequent job changing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'instead of'?
Suggestion: instead of
...o work consistently in an organisation, in stead of changing the job usually. Personally, I...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'path'?
Suggestion: path
...rtain profession, thus starting a novel paths. Indeed, this phenomenon is actually co...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56551724138 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09081720758 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648275862069 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5975234078 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157977812584 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449792785232 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416532426094 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988563845083 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032201846301 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.