Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is thought that choosing a job early and keeping it gives people more job satisfaction. While job hopping has its own benefits, I believe that a steady job would provide people with a greater sense of fulfillment.
On the one hand, the option to switch jobs frequently is advantageous to some extent. Firstly, employees can acquire a wide range of valuable skills. Job hoppers may find job satisfaction in being able to master vitall skills and put the knowledge gained into practice at the new workplace. For example, my brother decided to do various jobs without long-term commitment in London, which gave him countless opportunities to enhance his English skill. Secondly, people who change work regularly can find what suits them best. If a person adores the outdoor life, he or she will not happy having a desk job. As a result, he could switch career to seek more dynamic jobs that bring fulfillment.
On the other hand, there are a variety of reasons why keeping a job lead to more satisfying career. The first reason is that people would benefit from job prospects. As experience and commitment are both taken into consideration when a company decide who to promote, those who work longer stand a higher chance of promotion and pay rises. Consequently, they can move up the ladder and earn a lucrative living. Furthermore, people staying in a same job may build great work relationships. They can establish a steady and wide network with partners as well as build strong relationships with colleagues.
In conclusion, while both choices have their own advantages, it seems to me that long-term jobs are more likely to bring job fulfilment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94982078853 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80013892444 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637992831541 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5354290266 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3125 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8125 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294974622491 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905410445758 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688538233166 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166498511823 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488169846565 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.