Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city.
Some people believe that living in a horizontal city is the best, while others enjoy the life in a vertical city. While there are benefits for residents to live in a city with low constructions, I would argue that a city with high buildings is much more better.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why people choose to live in a city with low-rise buildings. Firstly, citizens will have to pay less for building services. If they settle in a private house, they may safe a great deal of money since they do not have to spend a large amount of money on services, such as maintenance or cleaning. As a result, they can pay for more important things like pursuing higher education or traveling to broaden their knowledge. Secondly, it is safer for inhabitants in case of emergencies. For example, if there is a fire starting in a house, people can quickly escape from dangerous areas because the building is not too high and it would not take much time to leave.
On the other hand, I think that the option to live in a vertical city is the best. The first reason is that a city with skyscrapers could have more spaces for public usage. For instance, they can maximize the land usage by establishing public green spaces, which not only enhance the city’s image but also provide citizens with more places to relax. Furthermore, living in an apartment in a tall building is more convenient. This is simply because a wide range of goods and services are often included in high-rise buildings thanks to shopping malls and service chains on lower floors.
In conclusion, while living in a horizontal city is advantageous to some extent, it seems to me that life in a city which have skyscrapers is the best choice due to its undeniable benefits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64951768489 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62312424458 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540192926045 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.132514638 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.285714286 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326526067188 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129098135203 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.187779396576 0.0667982634062 281% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227772311136 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12943342918 0.056905535591 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.