Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
It is true that foreign visitors pay more visits to museums and historical relics than local residents. There are several reasons for this problem and various measures could be taken by governments to attract locals to these places
Museums and historical sites are preferred more by tourists than residents because of some reasons. One reason is that museums are too familiar to nearby inhabitants. Most of residents hace been growing up in their areas. As a result, they do not curious or interest in these places. Furthermore, entrance tickets at some historical sites are expensive for the inhabitants to afford. For instance, in mountainous areas of Vietnam, many people find it rather hard to make ends meet, let alone to spend a large amout of their money on visiting famous historical attractions there.
Fortunately, there are a variety of steps could be taken to takle this issue effectively. Firstly, museums should be invested in more by authorities to refresh the exhibits. If a museum can create new exhibitions every season, it will be more appealing to citizens. Secondly, historical attractions need to be free for all the local people. Free tickets give locals countless opportunities to get access to historical sites easily, which help them to broaden their knowledge about their hometown without worrying about additional expenditures.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are some reasons why museums and historical places are mainlu frequented by foreign travelers. However, various steps can be taken to attract more visitors from the local areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the residents') or simply say ''Most residents''.
Suggestion: Most of the residents; Most residents
...are too familiar to nearby inhabitants. Most of residents hace been growing up in their areas. As...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28968253968 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80389928884 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599206349206 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5300890541 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2142857143 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421039668037 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126057778446 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857899909254 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257660024611 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532557271994 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.