Some people believe that government money should be spent on important things rather than arts such as painting and music. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is thought that government should not allocate resources to funding for art. While it is essential to prioritize expenditure on other important things, I would argue that spending money on arts have a lot of benefits.
On the one hand, there are two main sectors should be top government priorities. Firstly, investing in education must be high on agenda. The governments have the responsibility to ensure that every citizens are literate and educated. They need to establish more schools and provide scholarships for students coming from poor background. Secondly, healthcare is another significant sector. It is necessary to provide adequate funding to train more medical practitioners and conduct research for a cure for diseases. By doing that, the public health can be improved.
On the other hand, I believe that the government should invest money in arts because of some advantages. The first reason is that literary and artistic heritage are steady sources income of a country. This is because the leisure industry has experienced a dramatic boom in recent years. For example, in London, opera houses or other concert venues are thronged with tourists. Furthermore, arts have a profound impact on culture. In today's global world, painting and music play an integral part in cultural expression. For instance, people from different parts of the world can understand and communicate with each other via images and sounds.
In conclusion, while it is true that top priority of government should be other important sectors, I disagree that the art should be starved of public money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onsibility to ensure that every citizens are literate and educated. They need to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27058823529 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8424366953 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619607843137 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4960148284 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0588235294 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23986223223 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686907799569 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804489968457 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159830587748 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660510022744 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.