some people think that public health within a country can be improved by government making laws regarding nutritious food. others, however, think that health is a matter of personal choice and responsibility. discuss both views and give your own opinion.
An individual can touch the zenith to success with a good health. Presently, it is reckned by some masses that administrator must take some appropriate steps about people health and put some outlaw on packaging food. On the other side, opposite wind is also there.
Manifold points are there to support the former view. First and foremost, people can keep themselves away from canned food if government put some extra taxes. To illustrate, more tax mean high cost of fast food. This step stimulate masses for the use of domestic food which are healthy for their health. Therefore, people can not only improve health but also save money. Apart from it, government can aware folks through advertisement, seminars and tell people about the use of of unhygienic food and ingredients which are used for making food. So, administration can help people in a better way. Opposite wind is also there,
To begin with, some say that, folks are well educated they know the benefits and drawbacks of having fast food. There is no relation between people health and government. Moreover, government already pay attention on some other issues.this may put extra burden on administration. Thus, people should think about health and take decision regarding nutritious food.
To recapitulate, Undeniably, it is the responsibility of government to pay full attention on its nation's people. However, still I believe that without having food is a matter of taste and choice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
... seminars and tell people about the use of of unhygienic food and ingredients which a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents which are used for making food. So, administration can help people in a bett...
^^
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...better way. Opposite wind is also there, To begin with, some say that, folks are ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, thus, well, apart from, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 238.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14705882353 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74763252632 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613445378151 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7938487058 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5625 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.875 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293053787778 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927409334231 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650651143694 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166504089016 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517501781633 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.