some people think that regardless of age, teenagers who commit major crimes should receive adults punishments
In many societies, juvenile crimes are rampant mainly because of disparities in the resources available. Whilst, some sections of society believe that the punishment for the crime should be universal, regardless of age, others believe vice versa. However, I believe that the time awarded as punishment should reflect the nature of crime amongst juveniles. I will substantiate my reasoning in the course of this essay.
First and foremost, many crimes are being committed by teens are out of desperation, the fact that there are no job opportunities available will lead them to turn to crime, as the lure of instant cash is extremely attractive. Therefore, the system must look into these offenses based on the severity of the act in comparison to the nature of the individual. For example, in many countries, misbehaviors by teens will result in a warning and a mandatory unpaid community service sentence. This I feel, is correct because a kid should be institutionalized because he made a wrong turn in life, instead, he needs the support of the system to be set on the right track.
Alternately, there are crimes for which it is better in the public's interest that they are convicted and put behind bars. These crimes are more serious and therefore require stricter punishment. For example, in the 2012 Delhi Gang rape case, one of the accused was a juvenile, and as per law, they cannot receive the death penalty, so instead, he was rehabilitated and was released in 2015. Now although he was the youngest member to partake in this act, the act he committed was so gruesome, it should have warranted the same punishment as the adult offenders. This was not accepted by many in society, because they are afraid that he will commit this act again.
In conclusion, the nature of the crime should be the determining factor in whether a person should receive jail time or be asked to do unpaid community service.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, therefore, for example, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89846153846 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.797706584 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6311984776 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197286392946 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655307836714 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638106656449 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125465580798 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561971039964 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.