Some people think that robots are important for human's future development. Others think that robots have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, technologies are invited a lot. Here, some technologies are very useful like robots. Many people believe that robots are crucial for people's future creation. On other hand, some people think that robots have demerits on society. Here, I discuss both side and give opinion in ensuing paragraphs.
Technologies are vital for development. There are many technologies which is less time-consuming such as robots. Robots are helpful to cut time and do multiple works at a moment. In addition, they do all difficult works, so, it is for human. For example, many factories are invited robots for difficult work for goods transfer. Some robots which are looked like human that useful for safety purpose especially women. As an example, women lives alone in different country on business works and these kind of robots are helpful for defending bad people.
There are also some disadvantages. Because of the robots, people becomes lazy. Also, they become the fat person. On the other hand, mankind used robots for ulterior motives. As an example, some movies which are based on robots that impacts on youngsters and they also want robots. However, human are wrongdoing and harm each other to use power of robots. In addition, they do not afraid of doing bad things and erased all evidence help of robots and crime dramatically increased.
All in all, per my opinion, robots are useful when human used it right way. On contrary, it is harmful if people use robots for ulterior motives and it has negative impacts on community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 493, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...different country on business works and these kind of robots are helpful for defending bad...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rights'?
Suggestion: rights
...n, robots are useful when human used it right way. On contrary, it is harmful if peop...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, for example, in addition, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02362204724 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56720688319 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547244094488 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7584331735 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 60.7619047619 106.682146367 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.0952380952 20.7667163134 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354426457574 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107394782308 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939852386853 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227878043847 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961495620353 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.0946893788 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.95 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 9.78957915832 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.