Some people believe that schools should provide not only academic subjects, but also practical skills such as car maintenance or bank account management for the school children. As far as I’m concerned, I agree with this idea.
Firstly, on the one hand, learning academic subjects can cultivate a variety of ways of thinking, which is helpful for children to have their outlooks on life. On the other hand, through academic subjects, children can understand practical skills more easily and quickly.
Secondly, grasping practical skills is beneficial to children’s problem solving abilities and it makes it easy to get used to the society. For example, after children learn the car maintenance, they will put what they have studied in class into practice when there is something wrong with their cars.
Thirdly, if the school just open the academic subjects, students can not cope with difficulties in their daily life, although they are exposed enough academic knowledge. And it is the same that if school only offer practical skills classes, the children will have problems with understanding the details of skills due to poor foundation of knowledge.
All in all, I think only this two kinds of classes combine, can children grow up into excellent people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, i think, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 204.0 315.596192385 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28921568627 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6923637511 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632352941176 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 506.74238477 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.997530788 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.888888889 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6666666667 7.06120827912 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356734158554 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142289920152 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115096655379 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193035213601 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133393318062 0.056905535591 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.