In this age of technological advancements, many new ways of learning have been invented. Nowadays, pupils don’t read books but also use multiple gadgets for their study purposes. However, in my opinion books cannot be ruled out completely from the education system. This essay will provide insights about my opinion with illustrations.
Firstly, an ideal education system should definitely include books as well as technology in a balanced manner. Even though, computers and videos may be useful in learning processes, they don’t come as handy as books. A book is published after given a lot of consideration, research and analysis for a specific level with detailed examples to provide thorough knowledge. On the other hand, a video or film may present a subject in an interesting way but it lacks the quality of detailed knowledge.
Next, on several occasion, students prefer studying quietly and find computers and videos quite disturbing. Also if we evaluate given view from teachers’ perspective, it may become a nuisance for them to pause a video every time to explain something from it to the students.
Lastly, human interaction is very significant in schools and using computers and videos as alternatives to the books will completely eradicate it, which will eventually lead to various confusions about the subject as well as to the performance issues. Hence, instead of removing the books completely, students should be encouraged to use them along with technologies to get the better understanding of the subject.
In essence, we cannot completely overlook the available technologies in this era where they have become a part of people’s life. Instead, they should be used as a mode to teach students more effectively and in a creative way. As books include vast amount of data and facts, technology can be used to explain hard topics more efficiently and this will be the perfect blend in the education system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
...advancements, many new ways of learning have been invented. Nowadays, pupils don&apo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an interesting way" with adverb for "interesting"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
..., a video or film may present a subject in an interesting way but it lacks the quality of detailed kn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cks the quality of detailed knowledge. Next, on several occasion, students pref...
^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun occasion seems to be countable; consider using: 'several occasions'.
Suggestion: several occasions
...ity of detailed knowledge. Next, on several occasion, students prefer studying quietly and f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... computers and videos quite disturbing. Also if we evaluate given view from teachers...
^^^^
Line 9, column 213, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a creative way" with adverb for "creative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... to teach students more effectively and in a creative way. As books include vast amount of data a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, look, may, so, well, as to, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25559105431 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00888930599 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571884984026 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1776739355 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153461942082 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537109142055 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451358673497 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884566722179 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299268379217 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.