Some people think that student should learn competition, while others think that they should study cooperation. In my opinion, schools mainly teach how to co-working with others, which is the best way to educate children.
On the one hand, competing with others give thought that you must be winner. This perspective makes students more creative, brave and inspiring. It, however, also gives characteristics such as brutal, selfish and stingy. Furthermore, children who do not working with their friends will do anything to get what they want and compete all people around them. For example, today all the crimes in our social is taken by the selfish people who only want to have everything and do not willing to share it with others.
On the other hand, teamwork makes student friendly, kind-hearted and generous. Moreover, co-working can address problems easily and properly because many different ideas will be given and everyone will discuss together to meet common consent, so the most suitable solution will be chosen for each situation. For instance, a group of students lost in forest in a vacation, from the lesson about cooperation in school, they will know how to service with others and together find the way out. Therefore, when they who studied how to cooperate with others become adult, it will important strength to get a job.
In conclusion, schools have essential responsibility for how children become good person. Thus, their first primary lesson should be working together, which helps them to be conscious part of public.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not willing to share it with others. On the other hand, teamwork makes studen...
^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ss problems easily and properly because many different ideas will be given and everyone will d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18326693227 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62239779721 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637450199203 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2014557026 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.076923077 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3076923077 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201114972888 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726742305236 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441273920538 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132818817003 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477104100176 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.