Some people think spending on arts is a waste of money rather than a budget should be diverted to other public services. Do you agree or disagree?
Wasting money on arts is not a good choice, thought by some. However, should be spent on public services. I am totally satisfied with this statement. I believe that by spending on transportation, hospital, education system which is beneficial for this modern world and it will be returned us in a positive ways.
Firstly, A good transport make people feel comfortable and found it worth. In other words, build trains for worker not for traveller which is less consuming, provide some extra facilities. For instantiate, food and drinks, great seating and less croweded. For another example, when a person reaching a work place earlier and feel comfortable. He would like to pay more and makes a chain that will return us.
Secondly, Hospitals are inherit of the world and known as a second god's house. Generally, better treatment served by doctor and clean environment made by government that help patient recover faster, it may have less chances to spread a dsease so, people will be healtheir if the services reaches the expectations of a person.
Thirdly, In order to create best life for human education is the key. Which makes a person strong enough and smart, technical and more logical. In general, a educated people has a huge contribution in devoplment and to encourage people towards studies is to add some additional feature. For example, recently a news channel demonstrated that a person made a car which is run on electricity instead of petrol.
To concluded, spending on public services is a great idea in any-way because it is worth and encourage every individual as well society. In my opinion, it would make people enjoy the life, less worried about their life, and pushes to transformation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...nd it will be returned us in a positive ways. Firstly, A good transport make peo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'inherited'.
Suggestion: inherited
... return us. Secondly, Hospitals are inherit of the world and known as a second gods...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...elp patient recover faster, it may have less chances to spread a dsease so, people w...
^^^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people will be healtheir if the services reaches the expectations of a person. ...
^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'create the best'.
Suggestion: create the best
...s of a person. Thirdly, In order to create best life for human education is the key. Wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...technical and more logical. In general, a educated people has a huge contribution...
^
Line 7, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s run on electricity instead of petrol. To concluded, spending on public service...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for example, in general, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01748251748 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8163961269 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618881118881 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.0704693718 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4117647059 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157009946589 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482786287813 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618422800105 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085844967843 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548095908836 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.