Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

The number of road accidents has been increasing over time which needs to be reduced, some argue that a policy of zero tolerance would be the main solution while others insist there are other methods to create safer traffic. The latter would be justified; however, the former sounds more convincing.

Many severe road accidents took away valuable lives that should be labeled as crime but sometimes being unnoticed. A noticeable root is because the government is being too soft to these situations, which causes many drivers to despise safety as well . Thereby, strict legislations such as fine, corporal punishments or even prison sentences could dispel the contempt and the potential of causing accidents of drivers and commoners. Moreover, if any driver has to be fully responsible for his case, it would be an exemplary event for others to be more cautious.

Another sizable part of the population argues that society needs long-term methods to improve the situation.The most common solution people suggest is education and awareness creation. This means that schools and parents should have serious lessons or even create a subject or talks to teach children about road safety when they start to form an independent mind, this should also be repeated many times until it becomes unconscious that humans have to consider safety first when driving. In addition to education, regarding driving licenses, organisations should raise the difficulty of the test so that the qualification of a driver can be fully tested by some criterias such as rapid response for unexpected situations. This would obviously reduce the amount of accidents for both pedestrians and drivers

But, in conclusion, it could be done that there should be a combination of punishment and other road safety measures. The drivers and pedestrians should be made aware and in case of accidents, both should be punished. When a traffic accident occurs, the negligence of both the driver and the victim is equally liable. Thereby, both of them should be made aware about the road safety issues and related punishment. The strict measure alone is unable to improve the road safety issues unless the other measures join their hands.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s many drivers to despise safety as well . Thereby, strict legislations such as fi...
^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...g-term methods to improve the situation.The most common solution people suggest is ...
^^^
Line 7, column 300, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...gence of both the driver and the victim is equally liable. Thereby, both of them s...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20505617978 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66832857848 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567415730337 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.1999825164 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.357142857 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314741298206 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117304150924 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693134172749 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202046850323 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433204561293 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.