The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graphs provide information on the number of foreigners ( in million ) coming to visit five different countries namely Brazil, Egypt, Malaysia, France and America in 15 years starting from 1995.
From an overall perspective, all five nations welcomed more tourists; however, while the number of international visitors insignificantly changed in Brazil and Egypt, this number for France made a huge shift.
In terms of Brazil and Egypt, their global visitor populations were low compared to other nations, with both standing at nearly 10 million in the initial year. Subsequently, the two figures experienced a tedious increase until 2010, with 12 and 15 million, respectively.
Turning to the USA and Malaysia, both two countries shared a practical same pattern, although the numbers of foreign tourists were significantly different. In 1995, America had roughly 70 million visitors while the number for Malaysia was only slightly above 20 million. Subsequently, both nations witnessed a moderate growth by 2005, with approximately 90 and 30 million, respectively. However, after that timeline, the former’s number showed a slight decline while the latter gradually improved by 15 million at the end of the span.
Given France, this country saw the biggest change in the global tourist number compared to others. Starting with roughly 30 million in the first year, the number then rapidly surged by 30 million after 5 years. Following that, the figure progressively jumped from 60 million to about 80 million ( the same as the USA ) in the last decade.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... information on the number of foreigners in million coming to visit five differe...
^^
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...rmation on the number of foreigners in million coming to visit five different countri...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on the number of foreigners in million coming to visit five different countries...
^^
Line 9, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mped from 60 million to about 80 million the same as the USA in the last decade....
^^
Line 9, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to about 80 million the same as the USA in the last decade.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37804878049 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84571718306 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60162601626 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5739248921 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.272727273 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.067648689225 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290288227075 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395071600597 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0477399216273 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433151456749 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.