Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that advances in technology allow people to benefit in many different aspects. However, in terms of shopping, the advantages of using hi-tech devices are still controversial, whether it helps trading easier to access or not. The latter would be justified, but personally, the former sounds more convincing.
Advanced technology is claimed to encourage shopping for several reasons. Obviously, shopping online is a method of saving time, this means it allows busy people to shop even if they do not have time to drive to stores. To be specific, consumers can use some ubiquitous apps on their phones such as Amazon, Lazada or Shopee for trading. Instead of going to different physical stores after a long day at work to collect a list of groceries to prepare dinner, which absolutely costs 1 to 2 hours, busy people just need to spend roughly half an hour choosing products and having them delivered home. In addition to avoiding time cost, some found it is more convenient when using those apps since it provides users a variety of choices, information on goods dimensions, material and also certain special uses and even reviews of other buyers to decide whether the products are worthy or not, which facilitate customers' decisions.
From another perspective, a part of the population,especially elders, argues that computerized shopping is making this activity complicated. Initially, using online apps can be easy for technophiles or the young, but for people who is computer-illiterate is can be challenging since there are so many steps or processes needed to be done.For example, my grandmother cannot order a dress online even though I have taught her many times; she still cannot log in, clarified her accounts, or choosing payment method. Another undoubtful reason is that internet trading was claimed to be risky. In detail, there are many toxic websites or unbelievable shops that could scam users for money or even bank account information.
In conclusion, online trading can be helpful to technophiles or people who are used to using technology, while it can be difficult for the old or computer-illiterate. Personally, I agree that online shopping is a great breakthrough for teenagers. It is hoped that people will wisely choose a suitable method
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...n technology allow people to benefit in many different aspects. However, in terms of shopping,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to trade' or 'trade'.
Suggestion: to trade; trade
...e still controversial, whether it helps trading easier to access or not. The latter wou...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , especially
...er perspective, a part of the population,especially elders, argues that computerized shoppi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ny steps or processes needed to be done.For example, my grandmother cannot order a ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17297297297 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07089354161 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605405405405 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.2414705482 49.4020404114 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.6 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103051867711 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401213250023 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0274985749014 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0672958381423 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232013330998 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.