Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today’s life. Others argue that the history is a value source of information. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There has been some debate and people has been saying the history is not worth learning. I would argue that history can bring more benefits.
On one hand, learning history is a waste of time. Most people memorize dates, names and facts when they were studying history. This information is not useful in our everyday life. Instead of learning history, we can focus on science or technology, which is more relevant to the future and today society. In addition, each historical event have a lot of perspectives, which can be interpreted in different ways. Because of this, learners can be lead to misunderstanding or a bias.
On the other hand, I believe the importance of learning from the past can not be denied. First, history teaches us about wars, tragedies which have occurred in the past, such as the Holocaust. It is crucial for people in the past, present, future to never forget these events and to ensure it never happened again. Second, the advance of technology today is the results from numerous experiment from the past. For instance, Thomas Edison had conducted thousands of experiment in order to come up with an idea of light bulbs. Through these studies, people can be motivated to do things they thought they could never done.
In conclusion, lessons from the past have taught us many valuables things which plays an essential role in our daily life. I believe the government and school should work together to find a way to make history more interesting.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86507936508 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6041785714 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5379170876 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.625 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194111089725 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606409312179 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478375507261 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113180534325 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376648391266 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.