Some people think that there are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change. Others believe that actions by individuals is useless and irrelevant and that it is only governments and large businesses which can make a difference. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many people believe that individuals can take some proactive actions to prevent global climate change; however,
others argue that only governments and large corporations can perform environmental protection activities. In my opinion, individual action is equally significant and should be taken into account.
There are several reasons why people hold a belief that global climate change can be prevented by governments and
large businesses. From the government perspective, they have the right to impose and enforce laws. By issuing strict
regulations on environmental protection, citizens and companies are unlikely to carry unlawful actions which produce
detrimental effects to the climate change. In business terms, if large corporations do not pour chemical waste into
clean water and send out exhaust fumes into the air, the climate can be protected remarkably. Only by complying with
environmental protection laws, can businesses promote sustainable development.
In spite of the aforementioned arguments, I concur with those who believe that there are activities that individuals can
do to support the prevention of the global climate change. Firstly, each citizen should use disposable items and do not
dispose of waste in inappropriate places because waste is one of the main factors of climate change. Secondly,
individuals’ efforts to walk, cycle or use public transport instead of using private cars or motorbikes which discharge
vehicle emissions into the air play an instrumental role in the climate change prevention strategy.
In conclusion, the prevention of global climate change is not the responsibility of governments and large businesses
only, tackling this problem also depends on individuals’ efforts to keep the waste to a minimum and limit the emission
of greenhouse gases.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80442804428 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18655571656 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594095940959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2480466302 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 15.0 4.38176352705 342% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430391754553 0.244688304435 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160818399369 0.084324248473 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118180450472 0.0667982634062 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140094623733 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979121020928 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.