Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down. Others, however, believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is worldwide argument whether zoos should be abolished or not. Individually, I strongly believe that these locations have their own pros and cons and can produce positive outcome if used properly.
On the one hand, zoos can create a detrimental living environment for wildlife creatures. There is no surprise that once animals are captured, their intrinsic essence is impaired so heavily that the wildlife is no longer suitable for them as the zoos unreasonably supersede it. Lolita, for instance, is a whale that can not adopt the marine habitats again after 45 years being locked in an aquarium. Moreover, due to visitors' vulnerability and ignorance, once the captured animals have any impulsive misbehaviors, they can be tremendously snowed under by hostility towards them, resulting in a more stressful unwarranted life in cages. Therefore, zoos would raise more problems for the wildlife rather than be a safe way to protect them.
On the other hand, zoos can undoubtedly provide great protection for wildlife species. Due to human implications on the Earth, wild animals have enormous difficulties in terms of their habitation. Therefore, zoos is essential to their survival, providing both subsistence and sustenance for them. For example, zoos are the safest places rescuing pandas from the lost of bamboo forests due to industrialization. Furthermore, thanks to permission for visitors to observe the captured wildlife species, public awareness can be promoted since they are acknowledged of the toil undergone by them since they have nowhere else to survive. Therefore, the effort to protect them will be leveled up to a higher agenda. After all, zoos can greatly benefit our global concern of protecting wild animals.
In conclusion, considering the zoo's merits and disadvantages, human should propose more effective regulations on such sites in order to fulfill our role to protect wild animals
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, after all, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3853820598 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98727447483 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607973421927 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3753075146 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.066666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279848679501 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103622944371 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448191487576 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176872436506 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237525780876 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.