Both men and women these days work full-time so it is logical for them to share household tasks equallym To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, both men and women are employed on full-time working to bring home the bacon. Thus, some people argued that it is natural to divide household chores equally among people living under the same roof. While I agree that everyone should participate in doing domestic works, I believe that it is difficult to share those chores equally
There is no denying the fact that people that live together are responsible for household tasks. Firstly, women will appreciate it when men take part in doing household chores that were believed to be women's work. That is a sign showing that men care for them and also reduce the pressure of doing all the works by women themselves, especially some labor-intensive and time-consuming tasks. Secondly, doing chores together helps to derive members' bond from understanding how tiring is doing housework and talking while doing it. Therefore, both men and women place much emphasis on their members' bonding moments. Moreover, thanks to the support of other members, people can have more time to pursue leisure activities and recharge batteries after working.
Despite the fact that it is good to share household chores, I think that it is almost impossible to share them equally. In contrast, sharing those tasks depend on their abilities and preferences is more effective. All the members should meet up and decide which part they are in charge of. For example, members who are good at cooking take responsibility for cooking, therefore the others will do the remaining tasks such as doing the laundry, folding apparel or washing the dishes. This method of dividing tasks, from my perspective, can be more effective, logical, and also bring satisfaction to members because they have agreed to do their part
To sum up, I reaffirm that every member should get involved in doing household tasks because they are all living in a house, not any individual. But it is better to find a way to share the chores compatibly than equally.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, i think, in contrast, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04268292683 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61211285198 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5938337072 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.142857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288938834864 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102300897439 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683288365966 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170486426921 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055768845138 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.