Due to growth of technology, it is used to take advice for medical problems for some people rather than seeing a physician. It can be due to various reasons such as laziness of making appointment with a doctor, financial problems and so on. In my notion whether it is a positive or negative trend depends on different factors.
Today, with fast-paced growing of technology and availability for all people refer to it for every purpose. From dating, cooking to consulting with it as a doctor. Some utilize it as their family doctor because they are so lazy to hang on their phone and make an appointment with their real doctor. Another group of people use it as their family physician because they are low in money and cannot afford high price of visits to their doctor. And maybe some people are so busy with their home chores, their profession or even both that do not have adequate leisure time make appointment and visit their doctor.
Whether it is a positive or negative element depends on various factors. If the person is really in short of money and it is a minor issue there is no problem to consult with internet technology. Moreover, if the patient has some familiarity with the disease and it seems that it is a common one such a cold or flu again it can be harmless to visit a website relating to a board of accredited physicians to give advice from them.
In conclusion, I believe that although consulting with a real doctor is so much better and reliable than referring to virtual world of technology it still worth conferring with technology.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, really, so, still, in conclusion, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6884057971 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61528957298 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528985507246 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7254881821 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.833333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350031097005 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128298545254 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106427601447 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201630547258 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119112507511 0.056905535591 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.