Nowadays, it can be seen that there are numerous organizations are developed and now people can do job easily. There are few people who deduce that the workers should stay in same working place or in an organization. However, in others thought of mind they have to move in different companies for work. So, this essay will discuss the both thoughts before a specific conclusion.
On the one hand, few decades ago most people working in one organization through their whole life time even now many prefer to work in one particular profession in company. Owing to this, workers can attain great knowledge about that work and that firm where they are working in, they can know very well that how it works properly and how it would be improved. He/she (worker) will get more skills about that work and ability to do it perfectly. In other words, a firm which runs a packed juice factory and, there is a worker who has been indulging for long time in work of juice making, it is evident that he would have attained a better technique to do that work. So as a result, seen after their perfect work the owner of this factory will pay more and with satisfaction, even at time he can get chance of bonus and promotion which is the goal of every businessman or worker and can reach their destination.
On the other hand, as compared to remain in one company there are a lot of benefits of switching job in other organization. The first and foremost is that better intellectual mind to handle distinct type of work because, to hopping in different fields they can equip themselves to do any work and can attain huge knowledge about that specific work. Moreover, opportunity to comradeship with other persons or workers and learn better communication skills as well, their intellectual level will be more enhanced. it is often seen that who switching their job one to another organization they have empty amount of confidence they have faculty to how interact with others for instance, a job hopper if worked in one company for few months or years and after shifted to another company he had learned already that how I meet and greet with someone who work together in on field which creates better relationship with colleagues.
To recapitulate, it is right that mortals are work in in one organization but, in my perspective instead of doing work in one association they can move to another one after few span of time so that individual can achieve new patterns of work and can increase their aptitude at the optimum level rather staying in monotonous work schedule.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...in one organization through their whole life time even now many prefer to work in one par...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...with other persons or workers and learn better communication skills as well, their int...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...tellectual level will be more enhanced. it is often seen that who switching their ...
^^
Line 5, column 643, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mount of confidence they have faculty to how interact with others for instance, a...
^^
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...late, it is right that mortals are work in in one organization but, in my perspective...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun span seems to be countable; consider using: 'few spans'.
Suggestion: few spans
...tion they can move to another one after few span of time so that individual can achieve ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 7.30460921844 301% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 448.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72098214286 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60883839038 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 673.2 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.6159026924 49.4020404114 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.071428571 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307526451375 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12527778142 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612612851961 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214724094635 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309832171876 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.