Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organizations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
One of the most significant concerns of people throughout the world is career development. The point at issue is whether workplace should be the same for individuals' entire life or switching between various work environments can be more beneficial. To achieve a clear picture, it is important to put this matter into a broader context.
On the one hand, it is believed that people should work for the same organization for their entire life. This questionable idea claims that if employees dedicate their professional life to the same firm, they can completely understand their tasks and the ins and outs of company, which leads them to become more experienced in a specific field. Set against this is the view that doing same works in the same environment for a long period can be extremely dull and tiresome. After all, work environment should be changed once in a while.
There are, on the other hand, those who state that people should work for more than just one corporation for their entire life. Their main observation is that altering work environment gives them a valuable opportunity to learn new skills and gain novel experiences. This can noticeably contribute to increasing workers knowledge and widening their professional relations. The contrasting view holds that shifting among different work positions might leads employees' knowledge to be stayed superficial; however, huge online courses and obtaining advice from other experts in the new company can help prevent this. It is accepted that working in a new environment can always stimulate a newcomer to learn faster and do his duty better.
On balance, the mindset that employees should devote their whole working life to the same firm can actually do more harm than good because an effective solution, in effect, should encompass much more than just becoming expert in a particular limited scope. As a result, not only does experiencing new positions and activities play a prominent role in staying motivated and energetic at work, but it is also a key factor in preventing employees from doing repetitive tasks and becoming stuck in a certain level of stagnation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...can noticeably contribute to increasing workers knowledge and widening their profession...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, while, after all, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12857142857 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80707706212 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8725943683 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.214285714 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324739084572 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126587635995 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101389520867 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205469549705 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931311538258 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.