Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace every day.
Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages?
Remote work has boosted to a greater extent in the last decade. A few individuals assert that work should be done at the workplace only whereas others have conflicting views. They said work from home is comparatively more efficient. This essay will scrutinize the both virtues and will give the personal view.
Opponents of this viewpoint said that being together at an office is an indispensable key to excelling any field. A person who is totally away from all the social contacts will become depressed. Moreover, they also say that it is crucial to spend time with co-workers in formal as well as informal situations. However, visual impact is also missing on the remote work. Undoubtedly, other peeps condemn that visual impact can be sorted out with the visual conferencing but it can never replace the face to face interaction.
Furthermore, Advocates of this virtue say that telecommuters can save a lot of time by working at home. Not only this, it can also preserve our Non-Renewable resources like Petrol and Diesel. Also, it is a time as well as the money-saving process. A person can become a techno savvy and very fluent in the target language. Last but not least, it lends a helping hand to relax an individual without any external pressure. For instance, this criterion might become successful in the case of females who have plenty of household responsibilities.
For me, the merits of the concerned topic outweigh the limitations.
Hammering the last nail of this topic, working from home is a vital aspect of any profession. It will prove a blessing in disguise for the needy people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, well, whereas, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0073800738 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85769951802 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59778597786 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6844847879 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.3888888889 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0555555556 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173099285938 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555230816342 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708281653039 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102576644163 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601321679869 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.