Some schools put the most advanced students in separate classes from their peers so they can study more challenging materials.
Do the advantages of this practice outweigh the disadvantages?
Some High scorers and low scorers will always be there in every field, few people can perform extraordinarily good in one thing while others don’t like it at all. These differences are everywhere and hence people must be treated accordingly. I am in oppose that advanced students should be provided with separate classes to ensure that they can sharpen their edges even more.
Leveling up students in skills that they already have is obviously a good idea as it will help to accentuate there skills even more. This opportunity is being provided to every student in most of the countries nowadays and that too in different things like Studies, Sports and other extra-curricular activities. In my school for example, one student was good at playing tennis than any of the other students in the tennis group and as an result to his performance he was sent to the training academy with school’s support and now he is an national level player. So, yes if the right guidance and support is there students can do good in their field of advancements.
To contradict the same, there are even disadvantages for this as everything comes with a price so does this. Many of the times it happens that the students start to consider themselves much more than any of their peers. The student that was sent to go through specific training in tennis no doubt became one of the advanced level player but he also started to consider everyone else below him whether they are the mates or teachers. And one more very important drawback is that these people will usually became less socially active as they always have their limited accesses to a specific group of people who are like them only. They have access to challenging materials but they don’t always boost their inner personality but only the tasks they are good at.
As a solution to this, the access to more advanced materials should be provided to students within the class premises only. This will not create differences between students and will help them to unite more.
To Conclude, There are basically an equal number of advantages and disadvantages for giving advanced understanding of the qualities a person is good at. But, My opinion would be that the access should be there to good material but people should not be segregated from their mates, they should be taught being good at their things by keeping them in the same class environment in school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...her students in the tennis group and as an result to his performance he was sent t...
^^
Line 5, column 542, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ith school's support and now he is an national level player. So, yes if the r...
^^
Line 9, column 505, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
...wback is that these people will usually became less socially active as they always hav...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, if, so, while, for example, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89130434783 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62258780858 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490338164251 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.906163674 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5625 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273514284216 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982916950253 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556472569639 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157949598325 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241219247476 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.