Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students.
Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages?
There is a common belief that international student exchange programs would bring benefits to all participants. Despite some obvious disadvantages of this projects, I believe that there are outweighed by the advantages.
On the one hand, there are several major drawbacks when teenagers go overseas. Firstly, those exchange programs cost a considerable amount of money, which a handful of students may be inaccessible. For example, students who come from developing countries would find difficult to apply student exchange programs in industrial nations because of the financial burden. Secondly, even with preparation and knowledge about the new environment, adolescents could still experience culture shock, which can affect them in different ways. Another potential drawback is health issues that can occur during the stay in a foreign country.
On the other hand, I believe that the benefits are more significant than such disadvantages. One reason for this notion is that international visitors would have a shinier resume which is valuable for them in the years to come. By working in foreign organizations, they will gain many practical experience that make their profile more competitive. Another reason is that teenagers would have a chance to experience culture exchange. This broaden their mind, and also helps them make new friends for a lifetime. Additionally, after finishing the program, overseas students tend to obtain more opportunities to find good jobs because they have a strong network of friends.
In conclusion, I would argue that the advantages of international student exchange programs are more significant than the disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
.... Despite some obvious disadvantages of this projects, I believe that there are outw...
^^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun experience seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much practical experience', 'a good deal of practical experience'.
Suggestion: much practical experience; a good deal of practical experience
...n foreign organizations, they will gain many practical experience that make their profile more competitiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61507936508 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07566819079 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587301587302 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8165308211 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.071428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209818492703 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711617719502 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616655257694 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151940257286 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524245745578 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.