These days, many colleges provide Internet-based courses as an alternative to conventional learning method. This tendency, in many cases, should be less beneficial.
The noticeable drawback is that online studying would almost surely alleviate direct interaction between students and their teacher as well as their friends. First, since Internet-course approach do not offer face-to-face engagement, learners tend to lose touch with their educators. This should lead to lack of timely intervention or assessment, worse still, should slow down their learning process. Similarly, those who are restricted to website forum areas, would have less chance to expose to interactive group work. As a consequence, they should lack fundamental skills, such as teamworking or discussing, thereby negatively affecting all-round development. The essay draws the work of “Covid-time research” conducted by Hanoi University, whose supposition is that 80% of graduates affirmably had communicative trouble when returning to the college.
Moreover, schools virtually cannot be replaced. This is attributable to educational institutions being well-equipped with comfortable furniture and teaching tools, which helps learning is more interesting and practical. For example, thanks to the modern laboratory in my high school, I had a chance to carry out many intriguing Chemistry and Biology experiments. In addition, school libraries are also regards as a reliable source for students to refer to documents. If there were no school, knowledge accessibility is likely to be much more tedious.
In conclusion, I, for the aforementioned reasons, believe that online studying compared to traditional learning method, would be less effective development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, similarly, so, still, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30133548734 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.708 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5382157818 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.428571429 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141091107692 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416641593177 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457197379333 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.078834224465 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478148650288 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.99 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.