Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Whether undergraduates had better study other subjects besides their specialities for degrees is crucial or not is still open to discussion. Though it is advisable to a certain extent that those attending tertiary education explore more than just their main subjects, I seem inclined to the view that they should prioritize their focus on their qualifications.
On the one side of the argument, learning about other subjects can get advantageous for broadening the learners' horizons. Through a comprehensive academic exploration of various fields, they can master discipline, vitally fostering a holistic understanding of the world. This interdisciplinary approach encourages creativity, problem-solving and critical thinking abilities. For instance, a university student majoring in math pedagogy can take a philology course to accumulate insights into natural and social sciences and humanities. In addition, exploring diverse subjects may let students be assessed on several competencies. As a result, it can uncover new interests and passions, shaping students' future career paths.
Nevertheless, proponents of dedicating all attention to studying for a qualification, including me, would highlight the importance of deep specialization. Cited as a well-based reason, focusing exclusively on one subject can allow students to acquire in-depth expertise, which may ensure they are well-prepared for their chosen profession. In other words, investing adequate time in mastering core concepts and skills of their field can help graduates develop a competitive edge and increase their success chances in the job market. Furthermore, prioritizing specific academic fields can prevent students from being snowed under high tension. Despite providing students with a wide range of knowledge, studying various university subjects might also put them under heavier pressure to maintain stable performances in both specialities and others. Therefore, if students do not need to attend many university courses besides their majors, their well-being will be less likely to get sick from fatigue.
In conclusion, though a broad exploration of many fields at university may be reasonable to a certain extent, deep exploitation of academic specialities seems better for undergraduates from my perspective.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9009009009 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30911582524 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660660660661 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7630551685 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291203213501 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891543948218 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615559837824 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162679125977 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086798651749 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.