Space exploration requires vast sums of money. Is the amount of money spent on space research justifiable? Could the money be better spent?
What is your viewpoint on this issue? Give reasons for your answer.
// space exploration, $$, profitable
Critics throughout the developing and developed world have debated whether spending on space exploration is justifiable or not. Alongside the arguments from both sides, the latest discoveries from NASA have casted light on this question based on its achievement and financial figures. This essay will discuss both views using these examples to demonstrate points.
To begin with, the groundbreaking discoveries made are intuitively perceived as the positive drivers of space exploration. The central reason behind this is twofold, firstly, resources that are exclusive on earth have potential values on scientific development. Secondly, the vacuum environment without gravity outside earth is a key factor for a considerable number of experiment. In fact, the material that employed on Tesla's electrical vehicles are derived from the space exploration in 19th century. Moreover, it must not be forgotten that although some of these experiments were failed, the experience of living in space station has fostered the plan of dwelling in other planets. Therefore, it is conclusively clear that the money spent on space research is justifiable.
Although there is a case for monetising the space research into some tangible products we can use in daily life, the impact of space exploration cannot be overstated, in particular the colossal investment. This is largely because the preparation of an exploration entailing construction, logistic and pays for researchers is deemed extravagant. For instance, recent extensive study from the US government ascertained that the spending on NASA last year was in fact tripled that on social welfare. Consistent with this line of thinking is that the cleavage between the rich and the grassroots should have been narrowed if the idea of space exploration had been demolished since WWII. Consequently, it is possible to state beyond doubt that space research intensifies the financial burden of our government.
In conclusion, the space research resulting scientific achievement is beneficial to our living but also hinders the societal development. Given the ongoing economic revival, it is predicted that the investment on space station will be increased in the foreseeable future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6432748538 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08538019166 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608187134503 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5490015208 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.625 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25858528966 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793374028176 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667655186662 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12765842439 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509807657863 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.