Spending money on space exploration is a complete waste. The money could be better spent on other areas do you agree or disagree?
Scientists and astronauts are always curious about space exploration for not only acquiring knowledge, but also to make great discoveries. However, some people argue that investing a large amount of national funds in developing space travel is a waste of money. I strongly disagree with this statement because it can pave the way to advanced technology and also help humans to find an alternative home to live.
Firstly, the main important reason to say that the space exploration is not just a waste of money is that it helps to develop various advanced technologies useful to mankind. One such discovery is the satellite, which can be applied not only to predict the weather, but also to alert natural disasters. For instance, most nations around the world are using space satellites for predicting natural calamities like cyclone, earthquakes and floods to save million of peoples lives. Likewise, distance and overseas communication would be impossible without launching satellites in the orbit.
Secondly, through space exploration, scientists are conducting innumerable space research to discover planets, which are suitable for humans to live in the near future. Moreover, they are anticipating that, in future, people cannot survive on this earth because of the surge in population as well as the dramatic rise of pollution. Thus, they have to find an alternative home to live safely through space research.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that expending billions of dollars on space exploration actually improve the living standards of each citizen in a nation and provide people with a new place to live in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t just a waste of money is that it helps to develop various advanced technologies...
^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...cyclone, earthquakes and floods to save million of peoples lives. Likewise, distance an...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
.... Moreover, they are anticipating that, in future, people cannot survive on this earth be...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cannot survive on this earth because of the surge in population as well as the ...
^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arth because of the surge in population as well as the dramatic rise of pollutio...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o live safely through space research. In conclusion, I strongly believe that e...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30384615385 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86536912747 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603846153846 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2117561135 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.363636364 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6363636364 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131613946294 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504419305273 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352367021036 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077899839947 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300550454722 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.