In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
In this day and age, despite several major breakthroughs in the field of agriculture, a surprising number of people are still suffering from starvation. As far as I am concerned, there are some plausible explanations for this burning issue, while the essay is going to simultaneously discuss possible solutions to tackle this existing problem.
On the one hand, there is a variety of rational justifications for this negative development. One of the most acceptable reasons highlights the unfairness and inequality of global food distribution. It can be widely recognized that poor countries are receiving less attention since the wealthier ones are dominating the resources and maneuvering flow of commodities. This directly causes famine and hunger in poorer countries, leaving many people with insufficient amount of food. Another contributory factor to this issue lies in inadequate care and irresponsibility from national authorities. It is indisputable that unscrupulous officials with corruption are channeling the public budget into unnecessary purposes, forcing a majority of citizens to experience extreme starvation.
Even though the matter seems to be at a serious extent, there is an array of different approaches to tackle the given problem. First and foremost, it is urgently essential for international organizations such as the United Nations to enact laws and policies to ensure global equality and a fair share of food supply. Moreover, reconstructing parts of the governments could be regarded as an effective solution to respond to the ascending wave of hunger. By doing this, it would be much more straightforward to scrutinize the functions of the authorized individuals, making sure they have the responsibility to tackle starvation instead of focusing on other absurd matters.
To sum up, the fact that many individuals are suffering from starvation can take root from a number of rational reasons in terms of global inequality and national responsibility. At the same time, it requires a lot of international efforts as well as a united collaboration so as to successfully challenge this perplexing issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...forts as well as a united collaboration so as to successfully challenge this perplexing ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, as to, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51524390244 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38395269716 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615853658537 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8887599716 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.214285714 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198974053266 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061012947468 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453668145276 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116853524478 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473340871483 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.