The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates changes in the weekly families' expenditure of a particular country in 1968 and 2018.
Overall, while food and housing accounted for significant proportions of the families' budget, other categories such as fuel and power took up trivial percentages.
Looking into the chart, it is notable that food occupied the largest proportion of families' spending in 1968, with 35% of the total budget being allocated for eating purposes. However, in 2018, this figure decreased significantly to only half of its previous number. In contrast, housing and transport witnessed increases in families' spending in two years. Particularly, families extracted 10% and 7.5% of the total budget for housing and transport respectively in 1968, after which the numbers nearly doubled to 20% and 15% in 2018. However, personal goods, as well as clothing and footware, saw an opposite trend, with the budget for those activities being reduced by half in 2018 and figures showing exactly 10% for clothing and 4% for personal goods. While the expenditure on household goods remained unchanged at 8% in both years, leisure activities experienced a noticeable increase in funding, with a 13% growth compared to its former number in 1968.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'families'' or 'family's'?
Suggestion: families'; family's
...chart illustrates changes in the weekly families expenditure of a particular country in ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, well, while, in contrast, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33163265306 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84102597162 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2995771651 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.625 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109947458083 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604373992619 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630744407905 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105318136282 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827884514196 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.