In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Nowadays, it is cannot be denied that there has been an outstanding advancement in the foundation of the global agronomy. However, the government all over the world still have a pan in a neck facing the starving disease. There are some factors which leads to the issue. Fortunately, there are also some suitable measures to successfully tackle starvation.
To begin with, several main elements lead to famine can be figured out. First of all, although the techniques of cultivation has been upgraded to a very high standard undeveloped locations still cannot leverage the promotion. Therefore, farmers of the remote countryside cannot achieve those innovations because of the lack of money to buy the achievements as well as the lack of knowledge or level to adapt and study the creations. Moreover, the difference of the agronomy grade between places bring a big disparity income along with the food production between those area. Secondly, if the area has to face too many disasters such as earthquake, drought, mad cow disease, grasshopper disease there will be an absence in the development of that country’s economy as well as the food manufacture. For example, even though Japan is extremely powerful in the technologies of cultivation and good at making money, they still have to accept other countries’ sponsor to have a recover in the economy along with the food production.
On the other hand, this issue can be solved with some visible ways. Firstly, the government should specially concern about the farmer especially the poor locations. Therefore, paying more money to import high quality seeds, compost, technologies and so on is very important for the farmer. Furthermore, the farmers should have some classes to improve the knowledge about the horticulture along with the technologies. Secondly, the government should have set up special project to have an effective defense against the disasters. For example, the authorities should maintain an enough amount of food or money in case there would be an disaster.
In conclusion, the famine is getting worse for some reasons, and there should be some possible solutions for this global sadness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'those areas'?
Suggestion: this area; those areas
... along with the food production between those area. Secondly, if the area has to face too ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 981, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...t other countries' sponsor to have a recover in the economy along with the food prod...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 632, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...of food or money in case there would be an disaster. In conclusion, the famine i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25287356322 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92092435965 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566091954023 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6642072563 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.529411765 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1176470588 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114273825513 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373189470536 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038607968319 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719950500718 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116467006017 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.